Showing posts with label MBA 留学、. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MBA 留学、. Show all posts

Monday, June 12, 2017

アンダーソン・スクール・オブ・マネジメントUCLA Anderson MBA Essay Questions and deadlines 2017-2018

 UCLA Anderson has posted their 2017-2018 MBA essay topic. Anderson only requires one essay (750 words), which remains unchanged from the prior years. An optional essay and re-applicant essay are also available.

First-Time Applicants (Required Essay):
We believe that the best results are achieved when you share success, think fearlessly and drive change. 
1. With this in mind, what are your goals at UCLA Anderson and in your short-term and long-term career? (750 words maximum)
Optional Essay:
The following essay is optional. No preference is given in the evaluation process to applicants who submit an optional essay. Please note that we only accept written essays.
2. Are there any extenuating circumstances in your profile about which the Admissions Committee should be aware? Please use your best judgment. (250 words maximum)
Re-Applicant Essay:
Reapplicants who applied for the MBA program starting in 2016 or 2017 are required to complete the following essay:
1. Please describe your career progress since you last applied and ways in which you have enhanced your candidacy. Include updates on short-term and long-term career goals, as well as your continued interest in UCLA Anderson. (750 words maximum)
Please note:
Your essays are the primary way for you to share your perspectives and plans with the admissions committee. The best essays are introspective, genuine and succinct in directly answering our questions and responding to our topics.



2017-2018 UCLA Anderson Deadlines
Round 1
Deadline: Oct. 6, 2017
Decision Release Date: Dec. 15, 2017
Round 2
Deadline: Jan. 5, 2018
Decision Release Date: March 29, 2018
Round 3
Deadline: April 12, 2018
Decision Release Date: May 24, 2018

For more information, see the UCLA Anderson website. 

US Business Schools Try to Boost Women Intake for MBA Programs


  • Just 37% of full-time, two-year MBA program applicants in 2016 were women. 


According to the Graduate Management Admission Council (GMAC), 75% of full-time, two-year MBA programs with 120 students or more reported a growth in applications from women in 2016. 
  • At Temple University’s Fox School of Business, 55% of MBA students are women. 
  • At the University of South Carolina’s Darla Moore School of Business, the proportion was 52%.*

Yet women are still under-represented on most full-time MBA programs. And just 37% of all full-time, two-year MBA program applicants in 2016 were women.

  • Syracuse University’s Martin J. Whitman School of Management has experienced percentages of women on its full-time MBA program more typical of US business schools across the board – increasing slowly but steadily from 30% for 2014’s intake, to 32% for 2015, and 39% for 2016.

One major reason for the lack of women is costs. This March, GMAC released an International Women’s Day white paper based on a survey of 5,900 business school applicants.
  • 38% of female survey respondents in the US cited financial reasons as the key reason why they had not yet accepted their admissions offer to business school, compared with 20% of male respondents.

Arizona State University’s WP Carey School of Business is tackling the MBA funding problem head-on. In 2016, it launched its new Forward Focus MBA, with the university covering the entirety of all incoming MBA students’ tuition. Applications jumped from 500 in 2015 to 1,159 in 2016. 
  • As well as boosting numbers of international MBA applicants, WP Carey increased its female MBA population from a plateau of 30% to 43% in 2016.
At WP Carey, the drive to open up more opportunities for women in business comes right from the top. 
  • The school’s dean, Amy Hillman, is one of the few female business school deans in the US
  • The school’s senior leadership team is also predominantly female.

WP Carey is a member of the Forte Foundation, a non-profit consortium of leading companies and business schools devoted to promoting women in business.



Since its launch in 2001, Forte Foundation has dished out $110 million in fellowships to 5,000 female MBAs, bolstering numbers of women in business school.

At the University of Rochester’s Simon Business School, the percentage of women in the MBA class in 2000 was around 25%. Now, it’s 34%.

  • For online MBA programs, 43% of applicants in 2016 were women. For specialized business master’s programs in management, marketing, and accounting: 52%. Full-time MBA programs face competition from shorter, more flexible, more affordable programs better suited to an active family life.
At Yale School of Management, 334 students make up the total enrollment for Yale SOM’s class of 2018. 43% are women.


The current MBA class at Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management has more women in it than ever before. Kellogg’s latest intake was 41% female.

For more information, see BusinessBecause

Friday, April 21, 2017

Big Data and Business: An MBA vs. Master in Business Analytics

2016 was the “Year of the Data Analyst.” According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the job market for various data analyst positions is growing far faster than average—around 27 percent annually. In fact, 85 percent of Fortune 500 companies have either launched big data projects or are planning to do so.

Big data, which refers to the practice of analyzing extremely large data sets to reveal trends and patterns, is reshaping the business world—and it’s here to stay. Companies like Google and Amazon have dedicated significant resources to big data, and a report by PWC estimates that the big data market for financial services is expected to increase to $53.4 billion in 2017.

As for the job market for data analysts, the McKinsey Global Institute estimates that by 2018, the United States could face a shortage of 140,000 to 190,000 workers with “deep analytical skills” and 1.5 million managers and analyst with the necessary “know-how” to interpret and apply big data.

The increasing emphasis on big data in business requires more workers who are able to analyze data and communicate the results effectively. Because employers want graduates who can do this work, many business schools are rethinking their curricula and integrating data science.

The MS in Business Analytics
Ninety-eight percent of companies believe that business school grads need to know how to use data to drive decisions. As big data has become a standard of business, it has also become a desirable part of a business education.
Beyond adding a business analytics concentration or a few big data electives, some business schools are making big data part of their core offerings. For example, UCLA Anderson School of Management is the latest of several leading business schools to offer a Master of Science in Business Analytics (MSBA).
In February, Anderson launched its newest academic degree program, the MSBA. It’s a 13-month long program that prepares students for a career in big data analysis with a combination of theory and application in a number of critical areas. The curriculum delves into mathematics, statistics, programming and data management as well as specific applications of business analytics including customer analytics, operations analytics and competitive analytics.

MBA Programs and Big Data
An MS in Business Analytics is typically a one-year program. The courses are largely focused on data analysis and interpretation, translating to a fairly narrow set of job outcomes after graduation.
For prospective students who are interested in a generalist experience, many MBA programs have begun to increase the emphasis on data in their curricula. For example, Cornell University’s Johnson Graduate School of Management offers a “re-engineered” MBA for the digital tech world: the Johnson Cornell Tech MBA. The program sits at the intersection of business, information science and technology. And when listing topics covered in the program, data science is one of the first mentioned, with courses such as “Data Analytics & Modeling” and “Designing Data Products.”

The University of Chicago Booth School of Business offers an MBA concentration in Analytical Management. Courses within the concentration include “Data-Driven Marketing,” which delves into actual market behavior of consumers, and “Data Mining,” which covers topics such as graphics, cluster analysis, multidimensional scaling, discriminant analysis, logic models, regression and classification trees, neural networks and issues in data collection and management.

MBAs who graduate with a focus on data analytics have the ability to work in a wide range of industries and functions. For example, graduates can work in marketing, given their ability to use data to understand advertising and consumer behavior. Or they can work for a firm like KPMG or Deloitte, using their skills to analyze risk and incorporated uncertainty to identify profitable customers and determine optimal pricing policies.

For the original article go to metromba.com.


Tuesday, April 4, 2017

Record 46% Of INSEAD MBAs Go Into Consulting


INSEAD is well known as one of the top feeder business schools for the global consulting industry, sending more MBAs into the field than any other B-school in the world. But in 2016 46% of the graduating class last year accepted jobs in the consulting sector, up from 43% a year earlier and nearly 13 percentage points higher than just three years ago.

The three big global players, McKinsey & Co., Boston Consulting Group, and Bain & Co. took 29.8% of the graduates who reported their career choices to INSEAD. 

McKinsey employed 125, up from 102 MBAs last year. 
BCG hired 67 grads, slightly down from 72 a year earlier.
Bain employed 48, down from 52 a year earlier. 

Only three firms, all in technology, broke up the consulting party: Amazon, Microsoft and Google, which were among the dozen top employers. 

Many of these graduates returned to their firms after picking up their MBA in the 10-month-long program. The accelerated pace of the MBA experience makes the school particularly appealing to consulting firms who sponsor their employees. The McKinsey total, for example, includes 75 new hires and 50 MBAs who returned to the firm. At BCG, 26 of the 67 hires were of former employees, while at Bain 14 of 48 total hires had previously worked for the firm.

The total median compensation package, adjusted for the percentage of graduates reporting sign-on and year-end performance bonuses, totaled $134,268, a 2.9% decline from a year earlier. 

The total pay is composed of median salary of $102,500, sign-on bonuses of $22,800, reported by 65% of the class, and performance bonuses of $22,300, received by 74% of the MBAs. 

INSEAD’s $134,268 total, just behind the University of Texas McCombs School’s $135,885, puts INSEAD behind 19 U.S. business schools. The highest paid MBA graduates last year again came off the campus of Stanford University’s Graduate School of Business and Harvard Business School. Stanford MBAs pulled down a total median pay package of $163,827, while HBS grads landed packages worth $158,080 (see What MBAs Make In Their First Year Of Work).

The pay gap is largely the result of many more INSEAD MBAs going to work in countries where pay levels are significantly lower than they are in more mature economies as well as many students who enter the program with salaries below those at many U.S. schools. Salaries across the world, even in the same industry from the same employers, can vary widely.  INSEAD revealed that graduates who took jobs in India earned median salaries of $47,360, or 3,200,000 Rupees, compared to overall median salaries for the entire class of $102,500, a sum that would include the Indian salaries.

The median starting salary for a consulting job in North America topped out at $145,000, exactly the number reported by leading U.S. schools, the median in Southern Europe was just $77,900. In Latin America, starting salaries in consulting were only $81,300, while in Asia Pacific they were $113,500, according to INSEAD. Moreover, the cost of getting an INSEAD degree are significantly lower than those who enter a more traditional two-year MBA program, resulting in one of the highest returns on investment for any MBA in the world.


INSEAD reported that 89% of its graduates had at least one job offer three months after graduation, down from 90% in 2015. That level of employment also trails many of the leading U.S. schools. At Chicago Booth and Wharton last year, more than 98% of the graduates had job offers three months after commencement, while at London Business School, 96% of the 2016 class had job offers at that point. Still, the 89% job offer rate was just a point below Stanford’s 90% job offer level last year. Given the unusually wide dispersement of INSEAD grads around the world, the 89% offer rate is impressive, or as Hastie pointed out, “a remarkable achievement given the intensive nature of our 10-month global MBA programme and the macro-economic uncertainty in some of our traditional sectors and geographies.”

While 46% of its graduates landed jobs in Europe, some 29% gained employment in Asia Pacific, 10% in Africa and the Middle East, 8% in North America, and 7% in Latin America. The school said that no single country accounted for more than 14% of the jobs its graduates landed last year.

Only 27% of the school’s MBA students came from the consulting sector, 46% of the graduates enter the field.  Among those who have joined the consulting sector, INSEAD reported that 25% of them will be based in Asia (compared to 22% in 2015), taking away geographical share from Europe (falling from 48% in 2015 to 45% in 2016), with the share of the other regions largely unchanged. This mix mirrors the growth expectations of these regions.

Average consulting salaries remained mostly flat for most regions, with the exception of Asia and the Americas. In Asia, average base salary increased by around 3% while the average base salary fell by 4.3% for the Americas. INSEAD said the fall in average salary in the Americas is mainly due to exchange rate impact and the reversal in regional mix between Latin America (65% in 2016 vs 33% in 2015) and North America (35% in 2016 vs 67% in 2015). This brought the overall average down despite the rise in average salary in the North and Latin America regions of 11% and 17% (without currency effects), respectively.

The 46% of the INSEAD class that was hired by consulting, moreover, compares with just 16% at Stanford, 25% at Harvard Business School, 27% at Wharton, and 30% at Chicago Booth. One other consequence of this is that the school’s representation in other sectors, particularly finance and technology, is much lower than many of its rival schools. Last year, only 14% of INSEAD’s MBAs went into financial services, while just 17% accepted jobs in technology. Similar to previous years, 6% of INSEAD’s graduates last year became entrepreneurs post-graduation.



The school reported that almost eight out of ten graduates used their MBA to switch industries, functions or geography. Some 48% of the class changed country, 52% switched industries, while 63% changed function. “This year, our students chose exciting roles with more than 300 different employers in 68 countries, which represents by far the most global and diverse reach of any top MBA programme,” wrote Hastie. “This is made possible thanks to strong employer relations with nearly 600 companies and an alumni network of more than 52,000 in more than 170 countries. In terms of career change, nearly 80% of the class changed one dimension of sector, function or country, with 27% of the class making simultaneous changes in all 3 dimensions.”





Friday, March 10, 2017

Top-Tier Cross-Admitting Schools

The following schools tend to cross-admit from each other in peer groups. The following data shows each schools top six cross-admit schools in order of overlap

Elite Tier Schools and the top 6 schools they tend to cross-admit with
1. Chicago Booth: Wharton, MIT, Kellogg, Columbia, Harvard and Tuck
2. Columbia Business School: Wharton, MIT, Stern and Chicago, Yale, Stanford
3. Harvard Business School: Stanford, Wharton, MIT, Kellogg, tie: Chicago and Tuck
4. Kellogg School of Management:  Haas, Chicago, Harvard, Tuck, Ross, Wharton
5. MIT Sloan:  Wharton, Stanford, Columbia, Chicago, tie: Harvard and Haas
6. Stanford GSB: Harvard, MIT, Haas, Yale, Wharton, Columbia
7. Wharton School: MIT, Chicago, Harvard, Columbia, Stanford, Stern

Tier 1 Schools and the top 6 schools they tend to cross-admit with
1. Berkeley Haas: Kellogg, Anderson and Marshall, Stanford, Harvard, MIT
2. Dartmouth Tuck: Darden, Yale, Duke, tie: Cornell and Ross, Kellogg
3. NYU Stern: Yale, Columbia, Wharton, tie: Anderson and Haas, Chicago
4. Yale SOM: Stern, Stanford, Tuck, MIT, Haas, tie: Columbia and Duke
5. Cornell Johnson: Duke, tie: Kenan Flagler and Tepper, tie; Georgetown and Darden, Tuck
6. Duke Fuqua: Ross, Cornell, tie Darden and Kenan Flagler, Tuck, Yale
7. Michigan Ross: Duke, Darden, Tuck, Cornell, Georgetown, Tepper
8. UCLA Anderson: Marshall, Haas, Ross, Stern, Duke, Cornell
9. UVA Darden: Kenan Flagler, Tuck, Tepper, Duke, Ross, Cornell