Showing posts with label global MBA、MBA 留学、MBA 申請. Show all posts
Showing posts with label global MBA、MBA 留学、MBA 申請. Show all posts

Saturday, July 27, 2019

2019-2020 Early MBA Deadlines

MBA Application Deadlines – Round 1 / Early Action


School Deadline Decision Notification Essay Released? Application Open?
UVA / Darden Early Action 9/3/2019 10/9/2019 Yes Yes
IESE Early Decision Round 9/3/2019 10/18/2019 No Yes
Harvard Business School 9/4/2019 12/10/2019 Yes Yes
Cambridge / Judge 9/9/2019 11/20/2019 Yes Yes
Yale SOM 9/10/2019 12/4/2019 Yes Yes
Stanford GSB 9/12/2019 12/12/2019 Yes Yes
Indian School of Business 9/15/2019
No
UPenn / Wharton 9/17/2019 12/18/2019 No No
Notre Dame / Mendoza Early Decision 9/17/2019 11/1/2019 Yes Yes
Northwestern / Kellogg 9/18/2019 12/11/2019 Yes Yes
INSEAD 9/18/2019 11/22/2019 Yes Yes
Duke / Fuqua Early Action 9/19/2019 10/28/2019 Yes
Berkeley / Haas 9/26/2019 12/12/2019 Yes No
U. Chicago  Booth 9/26/2019 12/5/2019 Yes Yes
Michigan / Ross 9/30/2019 12/18/2019 Yes Yes
Emory / Goizueta 10/4/2019 11/29/2019 Yes Yes
Columbia Early Decision 10/4/2019 11/29/2019 Yes
UVA / Darden 10/4/2019 12/11/2019 Yes Yes
CMU / Tepper 10/6/2019 12/11/2019 Yes No
Dartmouth / Tuck 10/7/2019 12/12/2019 Yes Yes
Cornell / Johnson October Round 10/8/2019 12/11/2019 Yes No
UT  Austin / McCombs 10/8/2019 12/17/2019 Yes
IESE Round 1 10/10/2019 12/5/2019 No
Rice / Jones 10/11/2019 12/6/2019 Yes
Duke / Fuqua Round 1 10/14/2019 12/18/2019 Yes
Vanderbilt / Owen 10/14/2019 12/13/2019 Yes
NYU / Stern 10/15/2019 1/1/2020 Yes
Notre Dame / Mendoza 10/15/2019 12/13/2019 Yes

Saturday, April 27, 2019

For This Year’s MBA Admits, It’s A Buyer’s Market


Applications to MBA Programs at many of the highest ranked business schools are down again this year, even as scholarship awards for admits and starting salaries for MBA graduates are at record levels.

Most schools closed off their third and final application rounds earlier this month with drops in application volume ranging between 5% and double digits.



The decline, moreover, is on top of last year’s plunge in applications which hit the top-ranked schools for the first time. What does it all mean for this year’s crop of MBA applicants? To put it simply, It’s a buyers’ market.

Well qualified applicants are racking up more admit offers than normal and more scholarship dollars are flowing to entice admits to take up those offers than ever before. 

  • This year’s drop, moreover, is the second consecutive year of down numbers for even the highest ranked MBA programs. 
  • Last year, the so-called M7 schools, which include those three plus Booth, Kellogg, MIT Sloan, and Columbia, saw a combined 4.7% drop. Hardest hit for the 2017-2018 admissions cycle? Chicago Booth which saw an application falloff of 8.7%.
  • Schools ranked from tenth to 25th suffered twice the decline in MBA applications in 2017-2018 than those in the Top Ten. All together, the Top Ten MBA programs experienced a 4.9% fall in applications; the next 15 ranked business schools saw their applications decline by 9.7%
In all, 70% of U.S. business schools reported declines in their MBA applications last year, according to a survey of the schools by the Graduate Management Admission Council. According to GMAC, U.S. business schools experienced a nearly 7% decline in app volume, including a 1.8% decline in domestic applications and a 10.5% drop in international volume across all program types.

The decline in applicant volumes will certainly lead to higher admit rates at most schools, but at least for us, the pool is deep enough that we feel reasonably confident about maintaining quality. 


There are many reasons for the continued decline in applications to MBA programs, ranging from a strong economy which keeps people in their current jobs to the rising price tags on many MBA programs with little transparency over the discounts in tuition through scholarships.




Thursday, September 13, 2018

ゴイズエタ・ビジネス・スクール Class of 2020


Emory MBAs welcome you to campus with a Coca-Cola toast.
APPLICATIONS UP OVER 17%
  • During the 2017-2018 cycle, the school received 202 more applications than the previous year – or a 17.6% jump. 
  • At the same time, the class size rose by nine students, though the acceptance rate did rise from 32.2% to 37%. 
  • Average GMATs climbed three points to 685, though undergraduate GPAs did slip by .1 of a point.
  • The Class of 2020 Both classes attracted 30% women to its ranks
  • International students account for 28% of the incoming class. 
  • Overall, the class boasts students from 21 countries, not to mention 11 U.S. military veterans.

Thursday, August 9, 2018

2017 MBA Pay: Overall and Base Pay

The Wharton School has poured significant resources into entrepreneurship recently. Courtesy photo

What MBAs Earn By Occupation: A Look At Top 50 Business Schools


This had better be worth it?”
That’s the 2:00 a.m. refrain of every first-year MBA student taking the core course in managerial statistics. Forget intuition – this is hardcore, mind-numbing math that requires synthesizing complex and contradictory data. Why endure it? Well, there’s the big days – the payoffs – that make all the stress and sacrifice worth it. It’s the important know-how that leads to job offers, the graduation ceremony, and that first paycheck that remind you why you did it. You may have missed out a few times, but now you’re ready to cash in.
Question is, how much are you worth?
RANK AND PAY DON’T ALWAYS ALIGN
That depends. Industry pay varies a bit, as do company packages. The real difference comes when you look at pay by school – particularly base pay. Take consulting. In this field, the highest base was generally conferred to graduates of the highest-ranking programs. Topping the list was the Stanford Graduate School of Business. Here, Class of 2017 MBAs reported a median base of $142,793. On one hand, that’s within range of Chicago Booth, Wharton, Northwestern Kellogg and Dartmouth Tuck graduates, who all made $139,000 or more in base starting out. Of course, Stanford pay is also $7,000 more than rival Harvard Business School – and over $8,000 more than nearby Berkeley Haas. In other words, Stanford consultants are either landing better packages – or their hiring is concentrated within higher-paying and more prestigious firms.
Bottom line: MBAs command wiggle room to negotiate, whether you’ve earned your degree from Sloan or Smeal. That’s why, each year, P&Q provides a frame of reference for prospective MBAs to evaluate what they can expect to earn – at least in terms of base pay. Supplied with the low, average, and high averages, readers can identify pay trends within their occupation or MBA program. Ranking doesn’t necessarily dictate pay, however. Returning to consulting, 13th-ranked Virginia Darden grads made off with $140,839 as a base salary, better than 10 programs either placed above or tied with them. By the same token, Emory Goizueta’s $136,035 haul bests 10 programs that ranked above them by U.S. News. More impressive yet, consulting hires from the University of Tennessee’s Haslam School of Business, which ties for 44th overall, raked in $133,400 in 2017 – higher than East Coast stalwarts like Yale SOM or NYU Stern. Rocky Top’s performance was hardly an anomaly, with the highest-paid Haslam consulting grad making just $140,000 – making pay relatively consistent across the board. While a lucky Stanford GSB grad earned the highest individual base at $228,000, you’ll also find a Vanderbilt Owen star who snapped up $208,000 to start.
MEDIAN BASE PAY IS A CONSISTENT START, YEAR-AFTER-YEAR
Average pay is a case in point. Just compare data between the Class of 2017 and 2015 in consulting. At Stanford GSB, consulting pay jumped by $14,515 over the past two years. And the numbers were nearly impressive at top-flight programs like Wharton (+$9,131), Chicago Booth (+$8,228), Northwestern Kellogg (+$7,204), and Harvard Business School (+6,367). In fact, 2017 grads from 17 Top 50 program experienced $6K or better increases in starting consulting base over the past two years.
This year, P&Q evaluated median base pay in six categories from the Top 50 American MBA programs according to U.S. News & World Report. Using data supplied by the business schools, we built side-by-side pay comparisons in marketing, operations, general management, finance, consulting, and other programs (a catch-all that can include health care, human resources, and MIS…and even  operations or general management depending on the program).
Why focus on just base? For one, U.S. News didn’t collect data for bonus and additional compensation by function – just a total median bonus in that area (which is included in the Overall Pay link). Mind you, this data resides in annual employment reports…but it comes with a caveat. Some schools, such as Berkeley Haas, only report this data in mean form. Others, such as Wharton, slice up large functions. At Wharton, for example, finance is broken into smaller independent categories investment banking, corporate finance, investment management, and private equity. As a result, it doesn’t offer a clean, dollar-for-dollar comparison like base pay, which is calculated the same way. The same principle applies to the ever-nebulous “Other Compensation” – which can range from stock options to travel reimbursement – a number that has traditionally been enjoyed by a far smaller percentage of graduates.
WANT MONEY? GO INTO FINANCE
Base pay isn’t a perfect barometer. For one, pay data isn’t adjusted by regional cost of living – a number that would involve altering data for each student at each school. In addition, the pay totals are subject to fluctuation based on the size of the sample. For example, in marketing, the University of Florida Warrington’s 2017 class actually pulled down higher base pay than an urban Ivy like Columbia Business School, to the tune of a $112,167-to-$109,559 margin. At the same time, the number of Columbia marketing students reporting their starting pay topped their Warrington peers by a 42-to-6 margin. In other words, smaller program pay data is more subject to fluctuations stirred by one or two paychecks outside the norm.
Overall, finance yielded the highest paychecks for the Class of 2017, with Stanford grads making $161,097. That doesn’t include bonus, which came to a $50,000 median each at Stanford GSB, Wharton, and Northwestern Kellogg. In fact, finance grad at a dozen programs came away with a starting base of $120K or more. If you’re seeking guaranteed pay – not a one-time signing bonus or run-yourself-into-the-ground incentives, consulting is the place to be. Here, 29 schools graduating consulting students who made a median base of $120K or better in their first year.
Looking for growth? At 12 MBA programs, operations grads enjoyed a pay increase of $10K or more since 2015 – an improvement bigger than finance and consulting combined. Overall, the largest bases were doled out to finance majors, with graduates at Wharton, Harvard, and Berkeley Haas each claiming $300K salaries.

Tuesday, May 15, 2018

Is A One-Year MBA The Right Fit For You?

So, what’s the difference between a one-year and a two-year MBA program?  The answer is much more complex than 365 days. Four crucial differences are outlined below, which should all be carefully considered when determining the most appropriate program to pursue.

1. The cost

Less time spent in a program means less cost-of-living expenses and only one year of tuition to fund. If you’re looking for a high ROI based on both time and financial commitment, the one-year MBA is an excellent option.

Keep in mind, however, that just because the one-year MBA takes half the time, it won’t necessarily cost half the money. When calculated on a ‘cost-per-hour’ basis (believe it or not, a few of my fellow MBA students did indeed use this calculation to decide whether waking up for an 8am class was literally ‘worth their time’), one year MBAs are almost always marginally more expensive.

After factoring in an entire additional year’s salary, however, that increased cost is typically made up several times over.

2. The content

I like to think of the one-year MBA as diving straight into the deep end of a swimming pool, while a two-year MBA is metaphorically easing into the shallow end and taking time to get your feet wet, adjust to the temperature, and contemplate exactly what you are about to plunge yourself into.

One-year MBA programs typically do not waste time with an overview of the basics and instead jump into the deeper content within the first few weeks. This means students must either choose their areas of focus sooner or do a lot of research on the basics on their own.

Consider this when reflecting on your purpose for pursuing an MBA in the first place: career switchers may find more value in an extended exploratory phase, while those looking to advance at a more rapid pace may prefer one-year MBAs.

3. The jobs

An obvious difference between the two types of programs is that a two-year MBA requires students to be away from the workforce for double the amount of time. This means one year less salary, one year away from coveted promotion opportunities, and one year of potentially missing out on chances to build a long-term reputation in the workplace.

However, one critical benefit of the two-year MBA is that the course structure is literally built for pursuing a summer internship. Having an entire summer dedicated to trying your post-MBA position before fully committing can be instrumental for a person switching industries, changing geographies, or trying a new type of role.

Speaking from experience, I feel obligated to warn prospective students that they will likely have to do a lot of cold-calling and independent searching to even have a chance for an MBA internship if they are pursuing a one-year program. When weighing the two types of programs, consider what is more important to you: another year in a full-time position, or an opportunity to test the waters before diving into a new role?

4. The people

Having only one year to form bonds with classmates is both an upside and a downside to the one-year MBA. A massive benefit of earning an MBA is building relationships—both personal and professional—that will last long after graduation.

A two-year MBA offers the opportunity to cultivate those bonds gradually and meaningfully, with ample opportunity to find your crew and experiment with new groups along the way. By the last few months of your program, you’ll undoubtedly start to feel a sense of nostalgia for the memories you’ve made and develop a sense of tenderness for your classmates.

What surprised me about a one-year program, however, is that those inevitable warm fuzzy feelings started early—the intensity of the program, the sense of urgency in an accelerated timeframe, and the jam-packed schedule of a one-year MBA quickened the pace of the relationship-forming stage and lit a fire under students to reach out to each other proactively in ways they never would have if they had an entire year more to get to know each other.

While there was certainly less time to bond, there was a sense of camaraderie almost from the start in my one-year program. That feeling of community was special, and likely could not have been achieved in a longer program. andrea-oxford
There is no perfect MBA program and no definitive answer for which type of MBA structure is ‘better’; but there is absolutely an answer for which is best for you—the guidelines outlined here can help you start to discover it.

Global MBA applications and enrolments ‘see double-digit growth’


Progress shows business schools have successfully innovated in a period of economic uncertainty, says survey
May 15, 2018

Business schools across the world have recorded double-digit growth in the number of applications to and enrolments on MBA programmes, according to a report.



A study from the Association of MBAs (AMBA) found that the average number of applications per MBA programme increased by 10 percent between 2015 and 2016, while the average enrolment per programme rose by 24 percent in this period.

three men and a dog
Endorsed applicants ‘three times more likely’ to gain offer
READ MORE
The findings, which were based on a survey of 223 AMBA-accredited business schools across the world, mark the second consecutive year of growth in applications, following a five-year decline.

Between 2014 and 2015, there was a 5 percent growth in the number of applications for AMBA-accredited programmes, based on the schools that completed the 2016 survey.

Looking at all AMBA-accredited business schools that submitted data between 2009 and 2014, the average number of applications and enrolments per programme fell by 44 percent and 8 percent, respectively, it added.

The 2017 Application and Enrolment Report also found that while the gender balance was still weighted towards men, business schools have been progressing in securing more women on to MBA programmes.

The proportion of applications from women rose by four percentage points to 37 per cent between 2013 and 2016, and the share of women enrolling rose by two percentage points to 35 per cent over this time.

However, this share is much lower in some nations, with just 10 per cent of applications to business schools in India coming from women.

Search our database of more than 3,000 global university jobs

Will Dawes, AMBA research and insight manager and author of the study, said that business schools had previously suffered from the “period of considerable global economic uncertainty” but the recent growth reflected their “ability to innovate” and “adapt to the market”.

Many MBA programmes are now much more flexible in terms of course delivery, he said, with “modular programmes” allowing students to maintain their careers and earn a degree quickly without attending classes full-time. Business schools also have a “more global outlook”, including more study-abroad opportunities and “further development of international campuses”, he added.

The report also features an analysis focusing on a group of 90 business schools, on which AMBA has collected data each year since 2011.

This showed rises in the average number of applications in the five years to 2016 across those institutions in eastern Europe (77 percent, Africa (48 percent), North America (25 percent) and western Europe (13 percent), while there have been falls in Oceania (down 17 percent) and the UK (16 percent).

In terms of average enrolments, there has been growth in Africa (56 percent), Eastern Europe (56 percent) and Oceania (15 percent), but falls in western Europe (down 19 percent) and the UK (8 percent), it added.

But Mr. Dawes said that it was important to note that figures on international campuses of business schools might have been attributed to the host country rather than the institution’s country of origin.

Overall, the regional breakdown “reflects the global shake-out” of the business school sector and the “prominence of Chinese, European and Latin American business schools”, he said.